Connect with us

news

Nigeria’s Tax Reform: Good Intentions, Troubling Signals – By Lanre Ogundipe

Published

on

Nigeria’s 2026 tax reform arrived with both promise and pressure.

After years of overreliance on oil revenue, shrinking fiscal space, and rising public debt, the state’s resolve to strengthen non-oil revenue is understandable.

A modern economy cannot function without an effective tax system. On paper, therefore, the new tax regime represents a necessary step toward fiscal sustainability.

Yet taxation is not only about numbers. It is also about legitimacy, trust, and social consent. This is where the early implementation of the new regime has raised troubling signals that deserve sober national reflection.

At its core, the reform seeks to consolidate Nigeria’s fragmented tax laws, modernise administration through digital tools, and broaden the tax base.

These objectives are sound. Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains among the lowest in Africa, and inefficiency has long plagued revenue collection. Any serious government must confront this reality.

However, good intentions alone do not guarantee good outcomes. The problem confronting the 2026 tax regime is not its philosophical justification, but the manner of its rollout and the context in which it operates.

First, there is the issue of public anxiety. Since January 2026, fear has enveloped large sections of the population — not because Nigerians oppose taxation, but because the reforms coincided with a period of severe economic strain. Inflation remains high, purchasing power is weak, and households are still adjusting to subsidy removals and currency volatility.

In such an environment, any new or more aggressively enforced tax measure is easily perceived as punitive, even when it is not intended to be so.

Second, communication has been inadequate. Tax laws are complex by nature, but complexity becomes dangerous when paired with opacity.

Many citizens and small businesses remain uncertain about what has changed, what applies to them, and what protections exist against arbitrary enforcement. Where clarity is absent, rumours thrive. Fear, once entrenched, undermines voluntary compliance — the very foundation of a successful tax system.

Third, and perhaps most damaging, is the persistence of multiple taxation. While federal authorities speak of consolidation, businesses on the ground continue to face overlapping demands from federal, state, and local governments.

Levies with different names but similar purposes are imposed concurrently. For small and medium-sized enterprises, this is not merely inconvenient; it is existential. Compliance costs pile up, margins shrink, and informality becomes a survival strategy.

A tax reform that does not decisively resolve this problem risks being judged a failure regardless of its elegance on paper.

Equally concerning is the perception of unequal enforcement. Ordinary Nigerians are constantly reminded of their civic duty to pay taxes. Yet there is widespread belief that large corporate entities, politically connected individuals, and powerful institutions remain shielded from the full weight of the law.

When enforcement appears selective, the moral authority of the state weakens. Citizens begin to ask a simple but dangerous question: why should the weak comply when the strong evade?

This perception is reinforced by developments in the banking sector. Complaints about unexplained charges, delayed reversals, and opaque fee structures remain common. While regulators insist that frameworks for consumer protection exist, the lived experience of many customers suggests enforcement is slow and sanctions insufficiently visible.

In a system where banks are seen as profiting quietly from customers while tax authorities intensify pressure on individuals and small businesses, resentment naturally grows.

It is important to be fair. The government is operating under immense fiscal pressure. Infrastructure needs are enormous. Debt servicing consumes a significant share of revenue.

Public services require funding. From this perspective, the urgency driving the tax reform is not malicious; it is structural.

Nevertheless, urgency must not override legitimacy. History shows that tax systems imposed without trust do not yield sustainable revenue. They drive evasion, expand the informal economy, and ultimately weaken state capacity.

Enforcement-first approaches may deliver short-term gains, but they corrode the long-term social contract.

What, then, is required?
First, clarity. Authorities must publish authoritative, easily accessible explanations of the new tax regime, written in plain language.

Citizens should know not only what they owe, but also their rights, appeal mechanisms, and protections against abuse.

Second, coordination. The federal, state, and local governments must urgently harmonise taxing powers and publish a binding framework that ends multiple taxation. Without this, the rhetoric of reform will ring hollow.

Third, equity in enforcement. Government must be seen to pursue large-scale evasion with the same energy directed at small taxpayers. High-profile audits, transparent reporting of recovered sums, and decisive action against corporate avoidance will send a powerful signal that sacrifice is shared.

Fourth, visible returns. Nigerians need to see tangible evidence that taxes collected translate into improved roads, healthcare, education, and security.

When citizens can draw a clear line between what they pay and what they receive, compliance becomes rational rather than coerced.

Nigeria stands at a delicate fiscal crossroads. The 2026 tax reform can either mark the beginning of a more stable, accountable revenue system or deepen distrust between the state and its citizens.

The difference will be determined not by the text of the law alone, but by how it is implemented.
Tax reform should be a bridge between government and society, not a wedge.

To succeed, it must be anchored in transparency, fairness, and empathy for the economic realities Nigerians face. Only then can taxation fulfil its true purpose: sustaining the state without suffocating the people.

 

Lanre Ogundipe,
Former President, Nigeria and Africa Union of Journalists writes from Abuja.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

news

Ahmed Raji(SAN) Accomplish Another Landmark Feat, Launch New School Block, Handover Ultra-Modern CBT Center To JAMB.

Published

on

By

Renowned legal icon, philanthropist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Alhaji Ahmed Adeniyi Raji, has once again reaffirmed his unwavering commitment to educational advancement as he is getting ready to launch a newly constructed school building and hand-over a modern Computer Based Test (CBT) Centre to Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) in Iseyin, Oyo State.

This historic event, scheduled to hold on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, is expected to attract top educationists, including the Registrar of JAMB, Professor Isiaq Oloyede, who will officially receive the CBT centre on behalf of the examination body.

According to statement issued and signed by Hon. Saheed Adejare Yusuf Alaran, brother, development partner to the legal luminary and made available to media, said this intervention initiative is part of Alhaji Raji’s long-standing vision to make quality education affordable, accessible and all-inclusive, irrespective of students’ socio-economic background.

Hon. Adejare Yusuf Alaran disclosed that the legal icon has taken full responsibility for the construction of a modern school complex comprising classrooms, administrative offices and fully equipped laboratories for the Senior Secondary arm of Raji Okeesa Memorial Comprehensive High School. The new facilities are designed to enhance teaching, learning and overall academic excellence.

In addition, Alhaji Raji has also built a well-equipped JAMB CBT Centre with a seating capacity of 250 candidates, fitted to meet global examination standards. The centre is expected to significantly ease the burden on students who previously travelled long distances to sit for UTME examinations.

Hon. Adejare Yusuf Alaran further noted that the official unveiling and handover will ensure the CBT centre is efficiently managed by JAMB for optimal use. He stressed that the initiative would save thousands of youths from avoidable stress while promoting fairness and efficiency in examination processes.

With this latest gesture, Alhaji Raji has once again etched his name in gold as a steadfast champion of education and youth empowerment in Oyo State and beyond.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

news

*Oyo Govt. Plans 60,000 Laptops for WAEC CBT*

Published

on

By

Oyo State Government has reaffirmed its preparedness for the official commencement of the Computer-Based Test (CBT) mode of the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) examinations.

This is in line with the Federal Government’s directive for a gradual transition from pen-and-paper to full digital testing.

The Commissioner for Education, Science and Technology, Hon. Olusegun Olayiwola, disclosed this while receiving the Zonal Coordinator and Deputy Registrar of  West African Examination Council(WAEC), Mr. Waheed Amode, and his management team during a courtesy visit to his office on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.

Olayiwola revealed that Oyo State Governor, Engr. Seyi Makinde has directed that the cost implications for the procurement of over 60,000 laptops for public senior secondary schools across the state be worked out, noting that the move is aimed at positioning Oyo State ahead of the full adoption of CBT examinations.

He commended WAEC for the proactive measures taken to address the challenges experienced during the 2025 examinations, while pledging the Ministry’s continued support in curbing examination malpractice and preventing vandalisation of school facilities.

In his remarks, Amode said the visit was to appreciate the Oyo State Ministry of Education for its support during the 2025 WAEC examinations and for its consistent collaboration with the Council over the years, describing the Ministry as a key stakeholder in the success of WAEC operations.

He disclosed that registration for the 2026 May/June WAEC examination closed on 2nd February, 2026, adding that the forthcoming examinations would be conducted using both CBT and pen-and-paper modes depending on the readiness of individual schools, while schools interested in full CBT participation are expected to formally indicate their interest through official correspondence.

Amode also warned that severe penalties await any candidate caught with mobile phones in the examination hall.

He stressed that such misconduct could lead to the cancellation of an entire school’s results, depending on the circumstances, and urged principals and teachers to uphold integrity in order to strengthen educational standards.

Meanwhile, Honourable Olusegun Olayiwola has called on parents, guardians and teachers to strengthen collaboration in order to address moral decline in schools, noting that effective partnership between the home and the school is essential for raising disciplined, responsible and value-driven students.

The Commissioner made the call while receiving members of the National Education Reform Movement (NERM), urging stakeholders to prioritise discipline and quality teaching, while NERM leader, Mr. Adewumi Abass, warned that weak parent–teacher synergy and rising examination malpractice pose serious threats to Nigeria’s education system and recommended the use of the resource book, “Parenting for Excellence,” as a guide for improvement.

 

Continue Reading

news

*Oyo NUJ Celebrates Patron, Olooye Taofeek Adegoke on Birthday*

Published

on

By

The Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Oyo State Council, has congratulated a distinguished Patron and renowned mediapreneur, Olooye Adeboyega Taofeek Adegoke, on the occasion of his birthday, describing him as a pillar of support for journalists and media development in the state.

In a congratulatory statement jointly signed by the Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, and Secretary, Dayo Adu, the Council extolled Oloye Adegoke’s outstanding commitment to the growth of the Union and the welfare of its members.

The council noted that as a responsible and dependable Patron, Oloye Adegoke has consistently demonstrated deep passion for the progress of journalism, maintaining a cordial and mutually beneficial relationship with the NUJ Oyo State Council.

It added that his unreserved benevolence to the Union and to journalists who cross his path, stressing that his interventions and support have positively impacted many practitioners within the media space.

According to the Council, the celebrant has remained a strong pillar behind several NUJ programmes and activities, offering support that has contributed immensely to the successful execution of professional and welfare-driven initiatives.

The Union particularly commended his rare gesture of giving without demanding anything in return, describing his selflessness as a virtue worthy of emulation within and outside the media industry.

Oyo NUJ added that Oloye Adegoke’s contributions as a mediapreneur have also helped in advancing media enterprise, capacity building, and opportunities for journalists across the state.

The Council wished him a happy birthday and prayed for continued good health, greater accomplishments, and more impactful years in service to humanity and the journalism profession.

 

 

Continue Reading

news

*Oyo NUJ Pledge Joint Action Against Misinformation*

Published

on

By

The Department of State Services (DSS) in Oyo State has reiterated its commitment to working closely with the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) to address security challenges and curb the activities of fifth columnists.

The State Director of DSS , Mr. Rasheed Adelakun, made this known when the executives of the NUJ, Oyo State Council, led by its Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, paid a courtesy visit to the state headquarters of the service in Ibadan.

Adelakun described the media as a critical partner in national security, stressing that effective information management and responsible reportage were essential tools to sustaining peace and stability.

He expressed concern over the increasing activities of fifth columnists, warning that their actions pose grave dangers to national security and peaceful coexistence.

According to him, the spread of misinformation and unverified reports could be exploited by such elements to undermine public confidence and social cohesion.

Adelakun, therefore, urged journalists to uphold professionalism and ethical standards in the discharge of their duties in the interest of national development.

Earlier in his remarks, the Oyo NUJ Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, assured the DSS of the union’s readiness to sustain collaboration with security agencies to promote peace, security and unity in Oyo State and across the country.

Abas added that NUJ would continue to sensitise its members on the importance of responsible journalism, fact-checking and adherence to ethical standards, noting that accurate and timely information remains a vital tool in supporting security agencies and strengthening national cohesion.

 

Continue Reading

news

One Death Too Many: Government Must Be Held Accountable ““The opposite of love is not hate, it is indifference.”- Elie Wiesel – By Lanre Ogundipe

Published

on

By

There are moments in the life of a nation when condolences become an insult. The massacre in the Woro and Nuku communities of Kaiama Local Government, Kwara State is one such moment.

Over one hundred and sixty Nigerians men, women and children were rounded up, bound, and executed in cold blood.

Not in a war zone. Not in a declared battlefield. But in their homes, on their farms, in the ordinary spaces of daily life where citizens are supposed to be protected by the state.

In response, government spoke. It always speaks. Condolences were offered. Troops were deployed after the fact. Statements were issued. And then silence followed, the familiar Nigerian silence that descends after tragedy, as though the mere passage of time could substitute for justice.

But when citizens are slaughtered in one coordinated attack and the primary response is sympathy, the issue is no longer insecurity alone. It is governance failure.

When warnings are ignored, graves multiply.
Several years ago, a former Chief of Army Staff and Minister of Defence publicly expressed loss of confidence in the ability of Nigeria’s security architecture to protect its citizens. He warned that communities were becoming sitting targets and suggested that citizens might have to defend themselves. At the time, the statement was controversial. Some dismissed it as reckless; others saw it as frustration.

Today, after repeated mass killings across the North-Central, the North-West, parts of the Middle Belt, and now creeping steadily into the South-West, that warning no longer sounds extreme. It sounds like an unaddressed alarm.

When a figure who once sat at the heart of the military establishment openly questions the system’s effectiveness, responsible governance demands inquiry and reform. Instead, the system closed ranks. The result is visible in mass graves.

Missing weapons, unanswered questions
Nigeria’s insecurity is sustained not only by ideology but by logistics. Armed groups operate with weapons, ammunition, intelligence and mobility. This raises a fundamental question that has never been satisfactorily answered: how do non-state actors consistently acquire arms in such quantities in a country with supposedly regulated armouries?

Over the years, there have been persistent allegations of missing or diverted weapons from police and military stockpiles. Senate inquiries have been announced. Committees have been formed. Investigations have been promised. Yet the outcomes remain largely invisible to the public.
Weapons do not simply disappear in a functioning state. When they do, and no one is held accountable, it creates an environment where criminal networks thrive. Citizens are entitled to know whether arms procured with public funds to defend them have been mismanaged, diverted, or abandoned to corruption.

Until there is a transparent forensic audit of arms procurement, storage and deployment, every massacre will raise the same disturbing suspicion: that state failure is not accidental.
Security agencies under scrutiny.

It must be stated clearly: many officers have paid with their lives trying to protect communities. Their sacrifice deserves respect. But institutions are judged by outcomes, not intentions.
Nigeria’s security agencies have long struggled with poor intelligence coordination, slow response times, weak oversight, and public trust deficits.

Allegations of corruption, abuse of power and selective enforcement are not new.

They are part of a documented pattern that has eroded confidence between citizens and those tasked with protecting them.

When attacks occur despite repeated warnings, when perpetrators operate for hours without resistance, and when accountability rarely follows, citizens are justified in asking whether the problem is merely incompetence or something deeper.

Asking such questions is not an attack on the uniform. It is a demand for institutional accountability.
Violence reaches the South-West.
For years, the South-West assumed a measure of insulation from the scale of violence seen elsewhere.

That assumption is now dangerously outdated. Criminal networks and extremist violence have found entry points into parts of Osun State through Ora-Igbomina and surrounding communities.

Farmers are afraid to work their land. Families fear nightfall. The early warning signs are unmistakable.

Yet political leadership appears distracted by ceremonies, anniversaries and public celebrations. At a time when security coordination should dominate governance priorities, optics and pageantry seem to take precedence.

Leadership is not measured by appearances in moments of comfort, but by decisiveness in moments of crisis.
Unequal seriousness across regions
Across Nigeria, a contrast is emerging. Some states, particularly in parts of the East and South-South, are investing in intelligence gathering, technological support, community surveillance and structured engagement with security professionals. These efforts are not perfect, but they demonstrate seriousness.

The question is unavoidable: what are other states prioritising? What value does infrastructure, celebration or political theatre hold when citizens are unsafe? Development without security is an illusion.
Security is not one policy item among many. It is the foundation upon which every other policy rests.

Beyond religion and ethnicity.
This tragedy must not be misrepresented as religious or ethnic conflict. Terror does not discriminate by faith. Bullets do not recognise identity. Christian or Muslim, Yoruba or Hausa or Igbo — the dead are united by vulnerability, not belief.

Reducing these massacres to sectarian narratives only benefits those who profit from chaos. The real divide is between citizens protected by power and citizens exposed to violence.

A government that cannot protect its people, regardless of who they are or what they believe, has failed its most basic obligation.

The dangerous appeal of self-help
In the face of repeated state failure, some citizens ask whether they must protect themselves. This is not rebellion; it is despair. But history shows that widespread vigilantism leads not to safety, but to cycles of revenge and instability.

The alternative is not lawlessness. It is accountability.
Citizens must demand:
Transparent investigations into security failures before and during major attacks.

A full forensic audit of missing or diverted weapons.
Clear responsibility for governors, commissioners and security chiefs where negligence is established.

Lawful, supervised community protection mechanisms under strict oversight.

Anything less is performance, not governance.
A quiet erosion of freedom.
There is an uncomfortable question many Nigerians now ask privately: are citizens valued only as statistics — to be governed, taxed, and mourned, but not protected?

When deaths are normalised and accountability is endlessly postponed, freedom becomes symbolic rather than real. Democracy cannot survive where life is cheap and power is insulated from consequence.

One death is too many
Let us return to the central truth. One death is too many. One hundred and sixty is a national indictment.

This massacre must not be absorbed into Nigeria’s long list of forgotten tragedies.

Condolences cannot replace justice. Silence cannot replace accountability.

History will ask what was done when citizens were slaughtered. Words alone will not be an acceptable answer.

 

Lanre Ogundipe , A Public Affairs Analyst, Former President Nigeria and Africa Union of Journalists writes from Abuja, Federal Capital City.
February 6, 2026.

 

 

Continue Reading

news

*UI College of Medicine Alumni Lead Nigeria’s Cancer Care Revolution* – By Tunji Oladejo

Published

on

By

*A landmark clinical trial is underway in Nigeria, thanks to the collaborative efforts of Obafemi Awolowo University, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Medserve and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre. The trial investigates PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in patients with mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer. The trial was approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC)—the organization responsible for ensuring that all health research conducted in Nigeria is ethical and globally compliant—and by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), the organisation that regulates and controls the manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, advertisement, sale, and use of food, drugs, cosmetics, medical devices, packaged water, chemicals and detergents in Nigeria.*

This is a moment of great pride for the University of Ibadan (UI) College of Medicine! Three distinguished UI College of Medicine alumni: Dr Lilian Ekpo, Dr Zainab Yunusa-Kaltungo and Dr Tolu Adewole are instrumental in this initiative. They are part of a groundbreaking clinical trial that’s set to revolutionise colorectal cancer treatment in Nigeria. Their expertise underscores the institution’s commitment to advancing cancer research and treatment.

Dr Abraham Ariyo, a UI College of Medicine alumnus and cardiologist based in the US, shared this exciting news with me. We’d connected online about 4 months ago, bonding over our shared interest in UI and the College of Medicine. As he said, “I have read your pieces about Ibadanland and the University of Ibadan, especially about Profs. Ronke Baiyeroju and Olayinka Omigbodun. You are interested in UI and Ibadan. You are engaging in similar efforts with me regarding the alumni of the Ibadan College of Medicine. I appreciate you.” He’s been sharing stories about notable alumni achievements and this immunotherapy trial is the latest feat!

Back to the basics! This trial is a major turning point in Nigeria’s fight against cancer, with potential implications for sub-Saharan Africa. Alumni contributions reinforce the UI College of Medicine’s reputation as a hub for innovative research.

This trial’s success could establish Nigeria as a frontrunner in cancer research, demonstrating the nation’s capacity to tackle urgent health concerns. Kudos to the UI College of Medicine for nurturing talented professionals who are making a difference!

The trial is partially funded by the Thompson Family Foundation. Co-principal investigator Prof. Olusegun Isaac Alatise says, “The approval marks an important milestone in the fight against colorectal cancer in Nigeria.” Co-principal investigator Prof. Fatimah Abdulkareem adds, “This collaboration demonstrates our commitment to advancing cancer care.”

MSK’s Global Cancer Research and Training programme partnered with OAU Teaching Hospital in 2013 to establish the African Research Group for Oncology. Dr T. Peter Kingham says, “We hope this trial will lead to a similar shift in treatment possibilities for Nigerian colorectal cancer patients.”

Dr Tolulope Adewole, Medserve CEO, emphasises, “Quality oncology care should not be a privilege; it must be the minimum standard irrespective of location.”

If any advanced medical innovation occurs in Nigeria, UI alumni are likely behind it. They might not always be in the spotlight, but they are driving progress.

Globally, colorectal cancer is a significant issue, and Nigeria is not an exception, with less than half of Nigerian patients with colorectal cancer living one year after diagnosis. Colorectal cancer is a type of cancer that typically affects the colon or rectum, often presenting with no symptoms at first. But when it progresses, it can be tough to treat.

Some common signs to watch out for are changes in bowel habits (like diarrhoea or constipation); blood in stool or rectal bleeding; abdominal pain or cramps; unexplained weight loss; and Fatigue

Risk factors include age (50+); family history; diet (low fibre, high processed meat); lack of exercise; and smoking and heavy drinking.

Screening is key! Procedures like colonoscopies can catch it early when it is more treatable. The good news is that research is advancing, and treatments like immunotherapy (like the trial mentioned above) are offering new hope. Stay proactive about your health, and get checked if you’re due!

Tunji Oladejo, mnipr, JP, writes from the University of Ibadan and is the Chairman of The Progressive Forum, Ibadan (TPFI) via oladejo65@gmail.com

 

Continue Reading

Trending