news
Ooni, Alaafin feud is needless controversy
“Chieftaincy titles, the crux of the current face-off between the Ooni and Alaafin, have these days become so debased they are bestowed on all sorts; it profiteth Yorubaland nothing”
These days, it is like our leaders prefer to leave substance and chase shadows! These are deliberate distractions from the real issues that should bother us. The surprise to many is not that the Ooni of Ife and the Alaafin of Oyo are at war but the way the new Alaafin was quick to pick up the gauntlet! How long ago, for goodness sake, was he installed as the Alaafin? The tussle between the two Yoruba thrones over seniority or supremacy issue is as old as the two obaship institutions themselves. Previous occupants of the throne tugged at each other.
I listened to both the departed Ooni Olubuse and Alaafin Adeyemi lay conflicting claims to seniority and superiority, each relying on historical evidence, colonial documents and authority, and or court judgements to prove their case. I read History as a course of study; so, I have an idea of the history, facts, and documents that the two thrones brandish to prove their case. Truth be told, none of the two monarchs is right as of today to lay claim to seniority or superiority over the other and, indeed, over many other Yoruba obas in the present dispensation. In times past, maybe; but not any longer. Times have changed. Empires have crumbled. Power has changed hands. No one may continue to live in the past and disturb our peace in the present circumstance.
Origin of the Yoruba
The Yoruba agree that they originated from Ile-Ife and that Oduduwa was their progenitor. Oduduwa is said to have 16 direct children and many notable grandchildren. Kingdoms founded by these include Oyo, Benin, Ila, Ilesha, and Owo. History also records Oduduwa sons/grandsons to include the Alara, Ajero, Alaketu, Olowu, Onisabe, Onipopo, Alake, Aremitan (who later became the Owa of Idanre).
The direct sons and grandsons of Oduduwa reportedly dispersed from Ile-Ife to found many other Yoruba kingdoms. One of them, Oranyan or Oranmiyan, was sent by his father at the request of the then Bini Kingdom for an Oduduwa prince, to help the Binis start a new dynasty, putting an end to the troubled Ogiso monarchy.
Oranyan went to Benin, was installed king and married a Bini woman who gave birth to a son named Eweka. Thus, the present Bini dynasty is an offshoot of the Oranyan blood. In other words, any Bini person given birth to by anyone married into the Bini royal dynasty since the reign of Eweka has Yoruba blood flowing in his or her veins.
Oranyan, for reasons best known to him, left Benin after giving birth to Eweka. Some historians said he could not stomach or cope with the behaviour of the Bini people. Others said the pull of home was too strong for him to ignore. Returning home, he founded the old Oyo kingdom with its capital at Old Oyo (Oyo-Ile, which the Hausa called “Katunga”, meaning “large walls”, as a result of its majestic, oval-shaped wall).
At one point, Oyo empire was the strongest of all the kingdoms in Yorubaland, sprawling from the savannah region of the North to the coast of the Atlantic ocean and as far as some parts of present-day Benin Republic. But it never mastered the whole of Yorubaland as we know it today and no empire lasts forever! They rise and fall for varying reasons. History teaches of so many of such powerful kingdoms which later fell: Mali empire, Songhai empire, Dahomey empire, Kush, Azom and Zimbabwe, Kanem-Bornu empire, the empire founded by Shaka the Zulu, Bini Kingdom, to mention but a few.
The fall of Oyo Empire
History abhors a vacuum; so the unravelling of the old Oyo empire (in 1835/36?) principally as a result of the treachery and rebellion of Afonja gave rise to other successor-states such as Ibadan, Ijaiye, the Egbas and Ijebus, not to talk of the Ijeshas, Ekitis and Owo. Many war-like kingdoms were founded by the soldiers and Yoruba (Oyo) people fleeing down South as a result of the vicious attack unleashed by Fulani/Alimi jihadists and their Ilorin/Afonja surrogates; these include Modakeke, Gbongan, and Ode-Omu. Ibadan (Eba-Odan), and Abeokuta (where Olumo Rock provided shelter from attack) were also new towns.
The Battle of Osogbo (1840), which checkmated the southward move of the jihadists was fought by a combined Yoruba army, primarily supported by Ibadan and Ogbomoso; thus confirming Ibadan as the new dominant military power in Yorubaland of the time. Effectively, the old Oyo Empire’s military power and political influence or dominance had come to an end!
The Yoruba wars
Enter Ibadan and its dictatorship over much of Yoruba land! Its tyrannical “Ajele” system of administration led to revolts, rebellions and wars against its rule by other Yoruba city-states. Civil war engulfed Yorubaland for almost 100 years. Google described it as “a series of prolonged and devastating conflicts that engulfed Yorubaland, primarily triggered by the collapse of the Oyo Empire in the early 1800s. These wars featured shifting alliances and power struggles between emerging city-states like Ibadan and Abeokuta/Ijaiye and the final, longest phase, the Kiriji War (1877-1893) which involved coalitions like the Ekiti-Parapo against Ibadan dominance. The wars ultimately weakened the Yoruba states and paved the way for British intervention and annexation in the late 19th century”
Google adds that “the internal collapse of the once-powerful Oyo Empire created a significant power vacuum and series of disputes over succession and control” leading to “the rise of new, powerful centres of influence, such as Ibadan, which engaged in expansionist campaigns to control trade routes and slaves.” The Yoruba civil wars of the period include the Owu war (1821-1829) in which a coalition of Yoruba states, including Ife and Ijebu, destroyed Owu town; Egba-Ijebu War, better known as the Owiwi War (1832 -1834) primarily over influence and control of trade routes; Ijaiye war (1860 -1865) in which Ibadan fought and destroyed Ijaiye, thus consolidating its hold on power and dominance in much of Yorubaland; and, of course, the war to end all wars, the Kiriji/Ekiti-Parapo war (1877 – 1893) fought by the Ekiti-Parapo forces to overthrow the Ibadan yoke and check its efforts to maintain hegemony over the entirety of Yorubaland.
The Old Oyo Empire lost its political and military control over the parts of Yorubaland it controlled 190 years ago! How, then, can today’s Alaafin still claim suzerainty over such territories? He cannot, just as the successors of Jaja of Opobo, Ovonramwen Nogbaisi of Bini, Shaka the Zulu, Mansa Musa of Mali, etc cannot today lay claim to the ancient empires founded and reigned over by their illustrious ancestors. Brandishing colonial records or judgments by courts that relied on such records availeth nothing.
Everywhere they went in what later became Nigeria, the British colonialists acted on their own whims and caprices, prompted only by what advanced their vested interests. If they gave any oba a salary higher than another or bestowed upon one fleeting privilege or advantage, it had nothing to do with superiority or seniority but only as it served the interests of the colonial power.
Is Ooni a direct descendant of Oduduwa?
Having said that, we must ask the question whether the Ooni is a direct descendant of Oduduwa – a son, grandson or whatever. One history says he is not, but is only an “arole” or overseer of sorts, a caretaker of the home after the direct sons and grandsons of Oduduwa had scattered abroad to found this or that kingdom. Another history described him as a priest or spiritual aide or mentor to Oduduwa and his sons and grandsons. Can he, in that capacity, rightly establish superiority or suzerainty over the direct descendants of Oduduwa? But there is also the history that says the Ooni is a direct descendant of Oduduwa as well as the spiritual leader of Yorubaland, Ile-Ife being the recognised source and cradle of the Yoruba.
Whichever is the correct history, Ile-Ife’s authority in Yorubaland is more historical, cultural, moral and spiritual than military or political. Can it now begin to exercise political or military powers that it never had? My considered opinion is that the one who once wielded power but lost it and the one who never wielded such power are one and the same! The one should not fight over what it lost almost 200 years ago, and which is practically impossible for him to recover in these modern times. The other should not now arrogate to himself what he never had.
Keep to your lane!
To conclude: What did the appointing authorities write in the letters appointing the Ooni and the Alaafin? Is it “Ooni of Ife” and is it “Alaafin of Oyo”? Or is it “Ooni of Yorubaland” and “Alaafin of Yorubaland”? If it is the former, then, let everyone restrict himself to his territory! No one should pretend to extend his territory beyond what is written in his letter of appointment.
If he so wishes, let the Ooni give titles limited to Ife and let the Alaafin similarly give titles limited to Oyo if he, too, wishes. Neither has the power to give – and neither should give – Yoruba-wide chieftaincy titles. And like Chinua Achebe counsels in “Things Fall Apart”, “Let the kite perch and let the eagle perch too. If one says no to the other, let his wing…” You may wish to complete the sentence! This also applies to other Yoruba obas and chiefs. Let everyone keep within his territory.
Chieftaincy titles, the crux of the current face-off between the Ooni and Alaafin, have these days become so debased they are bestowed on all sorts; it profiteth Yorubaland nothing! Therefore, any existing title or new ones that any of our obas might have given or may propose to give that flouts or may have flouted the golden rule of keeping to your lane is null and void and of no effect whatsoever!
When an athlete infringes on another athlete’s lane, what happens? He or she is automatically disqualified! Any Oba giving Yoruba-wide chieftaincy titles is like an aircraft overshooting the tarmac!
I come in peace!
State Council of Chiefs: How relevant?
Many had thought the problem of seniority or supremacy tussle between the Ooni and Alaafin was as a result of their being in the same “boat” or “ship”, as it were. You know it is said that we cannot have two captains in the same ship. That was the problem when the two foremost thrones were in the same Western Region, Western State, and the then old Oyo State.
The tussle at the time was over the chairmanship of the Council of Obas. Who should permanently chair the council? Or should the chairmanship rotate? No formula acceptable to all was found until Osun state was excised out of Oyo state – and everyone heaved a sigh of relief. The problem of chairmanship tussle between the Ooni and Alaafin was solved by that state creation as each now belongs to different states.
But the recent tussle over who has the right to bestow Yoruba-wide chieftaincy titles has, once again, drawn attention to the fact that we still harbour lice on our head. Such being the case, we will continue to have blood-stains on our finger nails. Thus, putting heads together to find ways of directing the bountiful energies, especially of our youthful obas, into profitable ventures that will better serve the needs of Yorubaland becomes imperative. For, it must not be said of our obas that idle hands are the devil’s workshop.
Not long ago, I heard murmurings coming from the direction of Ibadan that they, too, would not allow the chairmanship of the Oyo State Council of Obas to permanently reside in Oyo. There are cases like that simmering in other Yoruba states. Before those murmurings become a din, can we please do something! Should we kuku scrap every state council of chiefs to keep our peace and restrict each traditional ruler to his local government area?
news
Ahmed Raji(SAN) Accomplish Another Landmark Feat, Launch New School Block, Handover Ultra-Modern CBT Center To JAMB.
Renowned legal icon, philanthropist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Alhaji Ahmed Adeniyi Raji, has once again reaffirmed his unwavering commitment to educational advancement as he is getting ready to launch a newly constructed school building and hand-over a modern Computer Based Test (CBT) Centre to Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) in Iseyin, Oyo State.
This historic event, scheduled to hold on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, is expected to attract top educationists, including the Registrar of JAMB, Professor Isiaq Oloyede, who will officially receive the CBT centre on behalf of the examination body.
According to statement issued and signed by Hon. Saheed Adejare Yusuf Alaran, brother, development partner to the legal luminary and made available to media, said this intervention initiative is part of Alhaji Raji’s long-standing vision to make quality education affordable, accessible and all-inclusive, irrespective of students’ socio-economic background.
Hon. Adejare Yusuf Alaran disclosed that the legal icon has taken full responsibility for the construction of a modern school complex comprising classrooms, administrative offices and fully equipped laboratories for the Senior Secondary arm of Raji Okeesa Memorial Comprehensive High School. The new facilities are designed to enhance teaching, learning and overall academic excellence.
In addition, Alhaji Raji has also built a well-equipped JAMB CBT Centre with a seating capacity of 250 candidates, fitted to meet global examination standards. The centre is expected to significantly ease the burden on students who previously travelled long distances to sit for UTME examinations.
Hon. Adejare Yusuf Alaran further noted that the official unveiling and handover will ensure the CBT centre is efficiently managed by JAMB for optimal use. He stressed that the initiative would save thousands of youths from avoidable stress while promoting fairness and efficiency in examination processes.
With this latest gesture, Alhaji Raji has once again etched his name in gold as a steadfast champion of education and youth empowerment in Oyo State and beyond.
news
*Oyo Govt. Plans 60,000 Laptops for WAEC CBT*
Oyo State Government has reaffirmed its preparedness for the official commencement of the Computer-Based Test (CBT) mode of the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) examinations.
This is in line with the Federal Government’s directive for a gradual transition from pen-and-paper to full digital testing.
The Commissioner for Education, Science and Technology, Hon. Olusegun Olayiwola, disclosed this while receiving the Zonal Coordinator and Deputy Registrar of West African Examination Council(WAEC), Mr. Waheed Amode, and his management team during a courtesy visit to his office on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.
Olayiwola revealed that Oyo State Governor, Engr. Seyi Makinde has directed that the cost implications for the procurement of over 60,000 laptops for public senior secondary schools across the state be worked out, noting that the move is aimed at positioning Oyo State ahead of the full adoption of CBT examinations.
He commended WAEC for the proactive measures taken to address the challenges experienced during the 2025 examinations, while pledging the Ministry’s continued support in curbing examination malpractice and preventing vandalisation of school facilities.
In his remarks, Amode said the visit was to appreciate the Oyo State Ministry of Education for its support during the 2025 WAEC examinations and for its consistent collaboration with the Council over the years, describing the Ministry as a key stakeholder in the success of WAEC operations.
He disclosed that registration for the 2026 May/June WAEC examination closed on 2nd February, 2026, adding that the forthcoming examinations would be conducted using both CBT and pen-and-paper modes depending on the readiness of individual schools, while schools interested in full CBT participation are expected to formally indicate their interest through official correspondence.
Amode also warned that severe penalties await any candidate caught with mobile phones in the examination hall.
He stressed that such misconduct could lead to the cancellation of an entire school’s results, depending on the circumstances, and urged principals and teachers to uphold integrity in order to strengthen educational standards.
Meanwhile, Honourable Olusegun Olayiwola has called on parents, guardians and teachers to strengthen collaboration in order to address moral decline in schools, noting that effective partnership between the home and the school is essential for raising disciplined, responsible and value-driven students.
The Commissioner made the call while receiving members of the National Education Reform Movement (NERM), urging stakeholders to prioritise discipline and quality teaching, while NERM leader, Mr. Adewumi Abass, warned that weak parent–teacher synergy and rising examination malpractice pose serious threats to Nigeria’s education system and recommended the use of the resource book, “Parenting for Excellence,” as a guide for improvement.
news
*Oyo NUJ Celebrates Patron, Olooye Taofeek Adegoke on Birthday*
The Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Oyo State Council, has congratulated a distinguished Patron and renowned mediapreneur, Olooye Adeboyega Taofeek Adegoke, on the occasion of his birthday, describing him as a pillar of support for journalists and media development in the state.
In a congratulatory statement jointly signed by the Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, and Secretary, Dayo Adu, the Council extolled Oloye Adegoke’s outstanding commitment to the growth of the Union and the welfare of its members.
The council noted that as a responsible and dependable Patron, Oloye Adegoke has consistently demonstrated deep passion for the progress of journalism, maintaining a cordial and mutually beneficial relationship with the NUJ Oyo State Council.
It added that his unreserved benevolence to the Union and to journalists who cross his path, stressing that his interventions and support have positively impacted many practitioners within the media space.
According to the Council, the celebrant has remained a strong pillar behind several NUJ programmes and activities, offering support that has contributed immensely to the successful execution of professional and welfare-driven initiatives.
The Union particularly commended his rare gesture of giving without demanding anything in return, describing his selflessness as a virtue worthy of emulation within and outside the media industry.
Oyo NUJ added that Oloye Adegoke’s contributions as a mediapreneur have also helped in advancing media enterprise, capacity building, and opportunities for journalists across the state.
The Council wished him a happy birthday and prayed for continued good health, greater accomplishments, and more impactful years in service to humanity and the journalism profession.
news
*Oyo NUJ Pledge Joint Action Against Misinformation*
The Department of State Services (DSS) in Oyo State has reiterated its commitment to working closely with the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) to address security challenges and curb the activities of fifth columnists.
The State Director of DSS , Mr. Rasheed Adelakun, made this known when the executives of the NUJ, Oyo State Council, led by its Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, paid a courtesy visit to the state headquarters of the service in Ibadan.
Adelakun described the media as a critical partner in national security, stressing that effective information management and responsible reportage were essential tools to sustaining peace and stability.
He expressed concern over the increasing activities of fifth columnists, warning that their actions pose grave dangers to national security and peaceful coexistence.
According to him, the spread of misinformation and unverified reports could be exploited by such elements to undermine public confidence and social cohesion.
Adelakun, therefore, urged journalists to uphold professionalism and ethical standards in the discharge of their duties in the interest of national development.
Earlier in his remarks, the Oyo NUJ Chairman, Mr. Akeem Abas, assured the DSS of the union’s readiness to sustain collaboration with security agencies to promote peace, security and unity in Oyo State and across the country.
Abas added that NUJ would continue to sensitise its members on the importance of responsible journalism, fact-checking and adherence to ethical standards, noting that accurate and timely information remains a vital tool in supporting security agencies and strengthening national cohesion.
news
One Death Too Many: Government Must Be Held Accountable ““The opposite of love is not hate, it is indifference.”- Elie Wiesel – By Lanre Ogundipe
There are moments in the life of a nation when condolences become an insult. The massacre in the Woro and Nuku communities of Kaiama Local Government, Kwara State is one such moment.
Over one hundred and sixty Nigerians men, women and children were rounded up, bound, and executed in cold blood.
Not in a war zone. Not in a declared battlefield. But in their homes, on their farms, in the ordinary spaces of daily life where citizens are supposed to be protected by the state.
In response, government spoke. It always speaks. Condolences were offered. Troops were deployed after the fact. Statements were issued. And then silence followed, the familiar Nigerian silence that descends after tragedy, as though the mere passage of time could substitute for justice.
But when citizens are slaughtered in one coordinated attack and the primary response is sympathy, the issue is no longer insecurity alone. It is governance failure.
When warnings are ignored, graves multiply.
Several years ago, a former Chief of Army Staff and Minister of Defence publicly expressed loss of confidence in the ability of Nigeria’s security architecture to protect its citizens. He warned that communities were becoming sitting targets and suggested that citizens might have to defend themselves. At the time, the statement was controversial. Some dismissed it as reckless; others saw it as frustration.
Today, after repeated mass killings across the North-Central, the North-West, parts of the Middle Belt, and now creeping steadily into the South-West, that warning no longer sounds extreme. It sounds like an unaddressed alarm.
When a figure who once sat at the heart of the military establishment openly questions the system’s effectiveness, responsible governance demands inquiry and reform. Instead, the system closed ranks. The result is visible in mass graves.
Missing weapons, unanswered questions
Nigeria’s insecurity is sustained not only by ideology but by logistics. Armed groups operate with weapons, ammunition, intelligence and mobility. This raises a fundamental question that has never been satisfactorily answered: how do non-state actors consistently acquire arms in such quantities in a country with supposedly regulated armouries?
Over the years, there have been persistent allegations of missing or diverted weapons from police and military stockpiles. Senate inquiries have been announced. Committees have been formed. Investigations have been promised. Yet the outcomes remain largely invisible to the public.
Weapons do not simply disappear in a functioning state. When they do, and no one is held accountable, it creates an environment where criminal networks thrive. Citizens are entitled to know whether arms procured with public funds to defend them have been mismanaged, diverted, or abandoned to corruption.
Until there is a transparent forensic audit of arms procurement, storage and deployment, every massacre will raise the same disturbing suspicion: that state failure is not accidental.
Security agencies under scrutiny.
It must be stated clearly: many officers have paid with their lives trying to protect communities. Their sacrifice deserves respect. But institutions are judged by outcomes, not intentions.
Nigeria’s security agencies have long struggled with poor intelligence coordination, slow response times, weak oversight, and public trust deficits.
Allegations of corruption, abuse of power and selective enforcement are not new.
They are part of a documented pattern that has eroded confidence between citizens and those tasked with protecting them.
When attacks occur despite repeated warnings, when perpetrators operate for hours without resistance, and when accountability rarely follows, citizens are justified in asking whether the problem is merely incompetence or something deeper.
Asking such questions is not an attack on the uniform. It is a demand for institutional accountability.
Violence reaches the South-West.
For years, the South-West assumed a measure of insulation from the scale of violence seen elsewhere.
That assumption is now dangerously outdated. Criminal networks and extremist violence have found entry points into parts of Osun State through Ora-Igbomina and surrounding communities.
Farmers are afraid to work their land. Families fear nightfall. The early warning signs are unmistakable.
Yet political leadership appears distracted by ceremonies, anniversaries and public celebrations. At a time when security coordination should dominate governance priorities, optics and pageantry seem to take precedence.
Leadership is not measured by appearances in moments of comfort, but by decisiveness in moments of crisis.
Unequal seriousness across regions
Across Nigeria, a contrast is emerging. Some states, particularly in parts of the East and South-South, are investing in intelligence gathering, technological support, community surveillance and structured engagement with security professionals. These efforts are not perfect, but they demonstrate seriousness.
The question is unavoidable: what are other states prioritising? What value does infrastructure, celebration or political theatre hold when citizens are unsafe? Development without security is an illusion.
Security is not one policy item among many. It is the foundation upon which every other policy rests.
Beyond religion and ethnicity.
This tragedy must not be misrepresented as religious or ethnic conflict. Terror does not discriminate by faith. Bullets do not recognise identity. Christian or Muslim, Yoruba or Hausa or Igbo — the dead are united by vulnerability, not belief.
Reducing these massacres to sectarian narratives only benefits those who profit from chaos. The real divide is between citizens protected by power and citizens exposed to violence.
A government that cannot protect its people, regardless of who they are or what they believe, has failed its most basic obligation.
The dangerous appeal of self-help
In the face of repeated state failure, some citizens ask whether they must protect themselves. This is not rebellion; it is despair. But history shows that widespread vigilantism leads not to safety, but to cycles of revenge and instability.
The alternative is not lawlessness. It is accountability.
Citizens must demand:
Transparent investigations into security failures before and during major attacks.
A full forensic audit of missing or diverted weapons.
Clear responsibility for governors, commissioners and security chiefs where negligence is established.
Lawful, supervised community protection mechanisms under strict oversight.
Anything less is performance, not governance.
A quiet erosion of freedom.
There is an uncomfortable question many Nigerians now ask privately: are citizens valued only as statistics — to be governed, taxed, and mourned, but not protected?
When deaths are normalised and accountability is endlessly postponed, freedom becomes symbolic rather than real. Democracy cannot survive where life is cheap and power is insulated from consequence.
One death is too many
Let us return to the central truth. One death is too many. One hundred and sixty is a national indictment.
This massacre must not be absorbed into Nigeria’s long list of forgotten tragedies.
Condolences cannot replace justice. Silence cannot replace accountability.
History will ask what was done when citizens were slaughtered. Words alone will not be an acceptable answer.
Lanre Ogundipe , A Public Affairs Analyst, Former President Nigeria and Africa Union of Journalists writes from Abuja, Federal Capital City.
February 6, 2026.
news
*UI College of Medicine Alumni Lead Nigeria’s Cancer Care Revolution* – By Tunji Oladejo
*A landmark clinical trial is underway in Nigeria, thanks to the collaborative efforts of Obafemi Awolowo University, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Medserve and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre. The trial investigates PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in patients with mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer. The trial was approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC)—the organization responsible for ensuring that all health research conducted in Nigeria is ethical and globally compliant—and by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), the organisation that regulates and controls the manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, advertisement, sale, and use of food, drugs, cosmetics, medical devices, packaged water, chemicals and detergents in Nigeria.*
This is a moment of great pride for the University of Ibadan (UI) College of Medicine! Three distinguished UI College of Medicine alumni: Dr Lilian Ekpo, Dr Zainab Yunusa-Kaltungo and Dr Tolu Adewole are instrumental in this initiative. They are part of a groundbreaking clinical trial that’s set to revolutionise colorectal cancer treatment in Nigeria. Their expertise underscores the institution’s commitment to advancing cancer research and treatment.
Dr Abraham Ariyo, a UI College of Medicine alumnus and cardiologist based in the US, shared this exciting news with me. We’d connected online about 4 months ago, bonding over our shared interest in UI and the College of Medicine. As he said, “I have read your pieces about Ibadanland and the University of Ibadan, especially about Profs. Ronke Baiyeroju and Olayinka Omigbodun. You are interested in UI and Ibadan. You are engaging in similar efforts with me regarding the alumni of the Ibadan College of Medicine. I appreciate you.” He’s been sharing stories about notable alumni achievements and this immunotherapy trial is the latest feat!
Back to the basics! This trial is a major turning point in Nigeria’s fight against cancer, with potential implications for sub-Saharan Africa. Alumni contributions reinforce the UI College of Medicine’s reputation as a hub for innovative research.
This trial’s success could establish Nigeria as a frontrunner in cancer research, demonstrating the nation’s capacity to tackle urgent health concerns. Kudos to the UI College of Medicine for nurturing talented professionals who are making a difference!
The trial is partially funded by the Thompson Family Foundation. Co-principal investigator Prof. Olusegun Isaac Alatise says, “The approval marks an important milestone in the fight against colorectal cancer in Nigeria.” Co-principal investigator Prof. Fatimah Abdulkareem adds, “This collaboration demonstrates our commitment to advancing cancer care.”
MSK’s Global Cancer Research and Training programme partnered with OAU Teaching Hospital in 2013 to establish the African Research Group for Oncology. Dr T. Peter Kingham says, “We hope this trial will lead to a similar shift in treatment possibilities for Nigerian colorectal cancer patients.”
Dr Tolulope Adewole, Medserve CEO, emphasises, “Quality oncology care should not be a privilege; it must be the minimum standard irrespective of location.”
If any advanced medical innovation occurs in Nigeria, UI alumni are likely behind it. They might not always be in the spotlight, but they are driving progress.
Globally, colorectal cancer is a significant issue, and Nigeria is not an exception, with less than half of Nigerian patients with colorectal cancer living one year after diagnosis. Colorectal cancer is a type of cancer that typically affects the colon or rectum, often presenting with no symptoms at first. But when it progresses, it can be tough to treat.
Some common signs to watch out for are changes in bowel habits (like diarrhoea or constipation); blood in stool or rectal bleeding; abdominal pain or cramps; unexplained weight loss; and Fatigue
Risk factors include age (50+); family history; diet (low fibre, high processed meat); lack of exercise; and smoking and heavy drinking.
Screening is key! Procedures like colonoscopies can catch it early when it is more treatable. The good news is that research is advancing, and treatments like immunotherapy (like the trial mentioned above) are offering new hope. Stay proactive about your health, and get checked if you’re due!
Tunji Oladejo, mnipr, JP, writes from the University of Ibadan and is the Chairman of The Progressive Forum, Ibadan (TPFI) via oladejo65@gmail.com
-
news11 months agoInterrogating the connection between social service and charity
-
news2 months ago
Arrive Early To Examination Centers, Comport Yourselves – Oyo HOS Admonishes Civil/Public Servants
-
news10 months ago
ANPP block in APC expresses deep concern over marginalisation to re-evaluate membership
-
news8 months ago
LG Commission Chairman ‘Wolekanle’ Gets Oyo NULGE’s Support
-
news11 months agoAbdulrazaq Inspects Govt’s Multistorey Prototype School
-
economics12 months agoNNPC Shipping, partners unveil joint venture to boost crude transport
-
news12 months agoMan arrested for beating girlfriend to death in Lagos
-
economics12 months agoSubscribers lament as MultiChoice raises DStv subscription by 21%







